Nobody gets left behind. Nobody gets held back.
Most learning sites decide what your child should know from their grade. We find out what they actually know, then teach from there. Free while we build it.
Four children, same age, same classroom. This spread is normal. Every product that teaches to the middle of it fails three of them.
Two minutes, no card. A parent creates the account and gives permission before a child answers anything.
A wrong answer is the most useful thing that can happen
We stop. We do not just mark it red.
The site works out which idea underneath went sideways, from the specific wrong answer your child chose.
We draw it, in plain words.
One picture, one idea, no jargon. The kind of explanation you would give a friend who has not learned it yet.
Then we check that one idea, alone.
And if three explanations do not land, we tell your parent it needs a person, and move you on rather than leaving you stuck.
THE HONEST PART
Your child cannot get past a question by asking a chatbot
Every question generates its own numbers, so no two children see the same one. And before an answer counts, your child says how they worked it out, in their own words. We grade the thinking, not the spelling.
We are starting with one thread of maths, from halves and quarters of a shape up to ratios and rates, built for ages 6 to 15. More is coming. We would rather do one thing properly than five things badly.